Category Archives: belonging

connectivity

My physics teacher way back in high school, for all his antics, struck me with a realization when he exclaimed: “ An ocean is never the same when you drop a pebble”. He was explaining of course the principle of kinetic energy, that is, an object once in motion never stops until another object absorbs the energy. But the absorbing object gathers explosive energy that may later on translate into another form of energy, ad infinitum.

 

 

That was in 1982 then, when aside from tv, radio, game and watch, cinema, and betamax, we did not have any other optical entertainment. The Inconvenient Truth was still an idea but Al Gore did not have an idea that it would shape in a digitalized form. Then, the weather patterns were so regular that in the Philippines, rain was expected from June to February, and the leaves would fall early March presaging the summer heat of April and May. Lives and activities were then planned according to the weather patterns.

 

 

My physics teacher may have unwittingly nuanced his kinetic energy with the idea of connectivity, an inevitable interaction between man and nature, and amongst men.

 

 

For every boon there is the embryonic bane. The turbines which powered engines of trains and industries have propelled industrial revolution when civilization relied on synthetic products fashioned out of raw materials. Before the turbines, we had to hunt then cook the meat. Later, life is made convenient by processed meat, fast foods, machine-controlled temperature, etc.

 

 

Little did way realize, or shall we say, refuse to realize that for the convenience the inventions have offered us, a trade off with the environment is getting apparent. All through these years of seeming conveniences that we marvel, the atmosphere is thickened with particles, the ozone layer punctured, the seas littered with toxic wastes. In fine, for making our life easier than the hunting nomads, we sacrifice our environment, mother earth, which now threatens not only our way of life but life in general, with tsunamis, typhoons, dry spell, la nina and el nino. The notebook upon which I store my blog, and the cellphone that I use to greet my love ones, may make life here on earth meaningful, but years from now, when the batteries are drained, and the gadgets unusable, I would have to add, and this is ironic, to the threat of human extinction.

 

 

Connectivity. Everything, we do invariably affects the great cosmos. If we throw a pebble into the ocean, this is a connectivity which alters life and nature but does not really threaten earth and the earthlings. But threw a plastic in the ocean, in time, vulnerable sea creatures die, the fishermen lose their livelihood, their children, wallowing in poverty, migrate to the cities to become the scourges of urban living. And the government has to spend more for the policing of the cities, thereby draining financial resource which could have been well-spent in other productive ventures.

 

 

Logic 101 escapes me every time a head of state proclaims that the climatic changes do not threaten human existence. But the politicians, for their narrow vested interests, will always see white instead of black, wherever their interests would lead them. After all, between prostitutes and politicians, the only difference is the pursuit for power in the later, and the need to survive, in case of the former. But what is troubling is the pronouncement of some scientists, ( or pseudo-scientists?), that the environmental changes are not at all threatening. One may lack the scientific formulations, but at times, the basic form of knowledge, common sense, explains better than hypothesis and theorems. How else can you explain the respiratory diseases and allergies due to dust particles? Typhoon in the Philippines during the summer months of April and May? Inundation even for a moderate rainfall? If these scientists are the only ones to suffer the wrath of nature, one would not bother to raise an eyebrow for their “oh” very scientific conclusions. When the arguments become too complex, God beckons us to use common sense.

 

 

At another level of connectivity is in terms of human relation. In biblical sense, God is found in every man’s face, that we are all but manifestations of the divine, and hence, we are all members of the same family. But in these times, connectivity amongst men is shown with the information superhighway.

 

 

Information is a harbinger of change. During the cold war, the iron curtain was pierced with the shortwave radio broadcasting where liberal ideas were heard in communists areas. Years after, the liberal ideas became movements for change, and eventually, the overthrew of communist regimes from within. John Howard, the former Australian Prime Minister, was defeated due to two issues: environment and Iraq. Environmental issues henceforth will factor in elections of national leaders. As always, the battle starts in the mind, and the internet plays a major role in bringing a sea change in the way we treat the environment, and relate to fellow humans.

 

 

 

As I post this blog, like a pebble dropped in the ocean, its effects in the landscape of the human mind, may be precisely, only a pebble, hopefully not feeble. Yet, the energy of the pebble is unstoppable; it goes on ad infinitum.

Prev: 25 years hence, a reunion

belonging and alienation

Way back in college, there was this professor, Fr. Malley, who analyzed divine and human history in terms of alienation and belonging, instead of thesis and anti-thesis, the latter being more popular to the students considering the political temperature during Marcos time. The Marxist dialectical materialism took man as a mere object, a mere commodity in the historical moment. Fr. Malley’s analysis however considered man as the focal point of history. If history has to be understood, we have to dig deeper on the nature of man. To him, history is the full stretch of the tensions of belonging and alienation, played in the recesses of the human psyche and outwardly projected in our collective history.

twas in the Garden of Eden when alienation started

The Garden of Eden, although more allegorical than historical, jump starts the connection of the divine with the human and at the same time the alienation of man. At the end of the story of the Genesis, when God already breathed into man the breath of life, the Creator gave man an abode, which was a paradise on earth, the Garden of Eden. Man belonged then to the embrace of the Creator. But the snake in the garden which tempted Eve to take the forbidden fruit, opened man to the other world, the possibility of living beyond God’s reach.

It was in the Garden of Eden that man strayed away from completely belonging to God. Throughout the Bible, there is a constant struggle to belong to God and at the same time to be alienated therefrom. Moses, in leading his people to the promise land, was faced with pagan-worship, bacchanalia, sex orgies, and all vices in complete defiance of God’s commandments.

Moses parted the red sea only to be betrayed by the people he wanted saved

Human history is a mere extension of the biblical tension in terms of religious wars. In fact, the most gruesome war is not political but religious; the former war aims to conquer territory, but the latter is concerned with the conquest of the soul. What we witness today by way of terror attacks is not a clash of civilization but of one group trying to consolidate its piece in the already fractious religious debate, claiming their religion as the only path to salvation and the rest will lead to the road of perdition. The issue, to what religion should man finally belong, Christianity or Islam, has only alienated man from the source of love and belonging. In an attempt to spread its own version of salvation, people have been killed, and when called upon to account for the deaths, these groups would only charge the killings to collateral damage.

But why should man kill if he only wanted to belong to his divine? The answer lies in the estrangement of man. If we have to read historical moments, we have to go back to human nature. Without roots in the divine, man is a broken piece. The sentient, and intelligent man needs to belong, to the divine and to the people he truly loves. According to Saint Agustine, My heart is restless until it rests in thee. Ironically, the jihadist that kills is moved by the overpowering mission to accomplish a mission that is, for him, truly divine. If he fails in his mission, he not only fails his Allah but the people around him as well. He needs to belong, and if he has to kill to achieve this, then kill he must. Alienation is at times worse than death.

So too the Crusaders who slaughtered the Muslims on their way to redeem the Holy Land. The medals of war conferred on them were mere testaments of their deep desire to be accepted and to belong in the bigger Christian community.

The most lethal assassin is not one who brandishes his weapon with dexterity; it is one who is willing to die in the pursuit of a mission imposed upon him by his group that sets the common vision. If he dies, he will be a martyr to his brethren, no matter the scorn of the society that he has wronged. Unfortunately, in man’s desire to belong to a common mission, divine or worldly, he sets him apart, by force of circumstance , from the larger community. What we see now are packets of cohesive groups unwittingly annihilating each other.

The necessity to belong is both divine and human. It is existential in character. There is a proverbial hole in a donut. A donut ceases to be one without the hole. Man is suffering from an existential hole, an emptiness that he carries to his grave; he is forever in constant attempt to fill-it up but never succeeds. The members of the family, friends, and other humans who we love and care are sources of

Go to fullsize imagethe hole remains till we die

belonging that somehow fill-in the hole. But while still alive, we look upon God as the source of total completeness, as the Being with whom we truly belong.

Historical movements are manifestations of this existential hole in every man. People seek salvation in recognition of this hole. Otherwise, if man feels complete, there is no need to look for the beyond. Push to the extremes, we see congregation of people, who, in their search for their own version of salvation, have relegated others as mere collaterals.

Is man cursed to kill each other in the name of salvation? Look at the mayhem in Bali.

Tags: wars, religion, philosophy | Edit Tags

Sunday May 20, 2007 – 08:30pm (CST) Edit | Delete

Comments

(1 total) Post a Comment